Saturday, November 14, 2020

Not Intended On Sidewalks

Congress never intended for cellphone towers to be on sidewalks.  They are putting thousands of 4G, 5G and Wi-Gig up close to us even though the DC District Court in August 2019 ordered they prove it safe first.

New Hampshire exposes the agenda of the telecom industry, regulatory agencies we did not elect, those who intend to become millionaires in a worldwide total surveillance state and injectable neural brain interface experimenters who all refuse to mention how unsafe 5G millimeter wave frequencies are already known to be by ongoing  extensive military testing and use since the 1960's.

They claim these transmitters that are supposed to be 2500 feet away and 1500 feet up, are needed to pick up 5G signals that will drop if the 5G phone is moved inside a building.  They are also rushing up Wi-Gig which is the same as what is inside a microwave oven.  5G signals do not just pass through you.  Your helical shaped sweat glands are perfect 5G receivers.  It travels down inside you and bounces causing damage before shooting out.

New Hampshire consulted engineers, scientists and molecular biologists to research the health effects of 5G.  Below is a summary of their recommendations and a link to the full report.  I ask you send the recommendations summary to at least one other person, especially to any elected leader.

  1. Engage the US government to require the FCC to do an independent review of the RF standards and RF health risks;
  2. Require NH state agencies to include links on their website(s) about RF-radiation from all sources, including 5G, and showing how to minimize exposure, as well as public service announcements warning of RF health risks especially to pregnant women and children.
  3. Require eye-level signage for every 5G antenna in the public rights- of-way.
  4. “Schools and public libraries should migrate from RF wireless connections for computers, laptops, pads, and other devices, to hard- wired or optical connections within a five-year period starting when funding becomes available.” [please note, we support hard-wired connections, but as far as we know optical connections, such as Lifi, have not been proven safe. It is unfortunate that it’s included in this recommendation.]
  5. Collect signal strength measurements including worst-case conditions for all wireless facilities, including when changes are made, and make that information public. If measurements exceed radiation thresholds, the municipality can take the facility offline. Measurements taken by an independent contractor and the cost paid by the installer.
  6. Establish new protocols for measuring RF to better evaluate signal characteristics, taking into account the high-data-rate radiation known to be harmful to human health. Enable the summative effects of multiple radiation sources to be measured.
  7. Require that any new wireless antennae be set back from residences, businesses, and schools.
  8. Upgrade the educational offerings by the NH Office of Professional Licensure and Certification (OPLC) to include RF measurements.
  9. The State of New Hampshire should develope a continually updated map of RF exposure levels across the state.
  10. “Strongly recommend all new cell phones and all other wireless devices sold come equipped with updated software that can stop the phone from radiating when positioned against the body.”
  11. “Promote and adopt a statewide position that would strongly encourage moving forward with the deployment of fiber optic cable connectivity, internal wired connections, and optical wireless to serve all commercial and public properties statewide.”
  12. “Further basic science studies are needed in conjunction with the medical community outlining the characteristics of expressed clinical symptoms related to radio frequency radiation exposure.”
  13. “Recommend the use of exposure warning signs to be posted in commercial and public buildings. In addition, encourage commercial and public buildings, especially healthcare facilities, to establish RF-radiation free zones where employees and visitors can seek refuge from the effects of wireless RF emissions.”
  14. “The State of New Hampshire should engage agencies with appropriate scientific expertise, including ecological knowledge, to develop RF-radiation safety limits that will protect the trees, plants, birds, insects, and pollinators.”
  15. “The State of New Hampshire should engage our Federal Delegation to legislate that under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) the FCC do an environmental impact statement as to the effect on New Hampshire and the country as a whole from the expansion of RF wireless technologies.”
http://emfsafetynetwork.org/landmark-5g-study-by-new-hampshire-legislative-commission-recommends-reducing-wireless-exposure/http://emfsafetynetwork.org/landmark-5g-study-by-new-hampshire-legislative-commission-recommends-reducing-wireless-exposure/


They can not say they were not aware.  At Take Back Your Power there are templates for sending Notices Of Liability to elected leaders, telecom executives and utilities involved informing them they will be held liable if you are harmed by a smart meter, a smart meter neighborhood collection box or by all these wireless telecommunication transmitters or the metal  equipment boxes on sidewalks, all going up in front of our homes, schools and businesses.  Executives served hwhich ave stepped down and City Council Members have quit. 

No comments:

Post a Comment

DOD Prototypes Not Vaccines

DoD, CDC and FDA took great care to not produce any pharmaceutical chain-of-custody paper trail between suppliers, manufacturers, distributo...