5G will push more cell signals into the same airspace

5G will push more cell signals into the same airspace at faster speeds with far more modulation than current 4G cell technologies. 5G inside you can turn up your tiny electrical Calcium Signaling., flooding excess calcium into cells when it's not supposed to. 5G interferes with the protein involved in blood uptake of oxygen molecules. 5G at 60 GHz vibrates at the same frequency as oxygen molecules and oxygen molecules absorb the 5G.

You can see 4G causes the very few birds left to double flap their wings and they can't fly straight. You also see the birds of different species flying in formation down close to cars and around high traffic intersections.

5G can activate components for Biological Application Programming Interface if any are lodged in your brain. These are injected or are inside fibers experimentally released in the air and inhaled.

Material normally not a threat to your health, such as aluminum, renders it bio-available. It then can get through your lungs to your blood and can pass through your blood brain barrier, and accumulate in your frontal lobe, like so much combusted aluminum coal fly ash being shipped, loaded into, and plane sprayed on us. Stop letting your taxes be used to fund spraying us like bugs. Aluminum in your frontal lobe interferes with memory.

Nor should you let your taxes fund dumping machine shop byproduct fluoride in public drinking water. An environmental law was passed making it unlawful to release it on site. Instead of paying to store it, a PR firm was created to promote idea it prevents cavities and got water districts to buy it to put in public water. Your toothpaste tube warns not to swallow it.

It was first uaed to make concentration camp prisoners docile. It is highly toxic, destroys teeth, bones and lowers IQ.

5G has power densities of up to 30 times higher than previous systems of 1G to 4G and with penetration being enhanced, your helical shaped sweat ducts will pull 5G frequencies, spiraling deeper into your skin and will cause nociceptor pain.

Hardwire using copper or fiber optic cables at home and ask businesses offering wifi to do the same. There are Adapters available now for hardwire connecting cell phone to internet by connecting on ethernet cable from your router:

Android:        https://amzn.to/3ao4LN

Iphone/pad    https://amzn.to/30DMG9p

The US Congress never intended Towers to be in residential areas or antennas to be just 6 feet off the ground.  WTFs in Close proximity to people is Beyond the intent of the underlying law again which all FCC rules must be measured.

The FCC failed to address that it was speeding densification without completing its investigation of Health effects of low intensity radio frequency microwave radiation they did not adequately address the harms of deregulation they did not justify its portrayal of those harms as negligible how to cool a rational did the FCC characterize the order as consistent with its long-standing policy because the FCC mischaracterized the size the scale in the footprint of the anticipated Nationwide deployment of over 800,000 wireless transmission facilities that they're calling small cells crucially different from the consumer Signal Boosters and Wi-Fi routers they tried to compare them to and it's ridiculous that they would say Wireless transmission facility deregulation will leave little to no environmental footprint or they justify that wireless transmission facilities by their nature are inherently unlikely to trigger potential significant environmental impacts so the DC Circuit Court remanded it back to the FCC.

The October 1, 2019 and August 9, 2019 D.C. District Court of Appeals details:

As of October 1, 2019, these “services” were confirmed by the DC Circuit Courts of Appeals in Case No, 18-1051, Mozilla et al. v. FCC, to be reclassified by the FCC as Title I, unregulated "Information Services". At present, only wireline and wireless voice transmissions are classified as Title II, regulated "Telecommunications Services”.  Title I and Title II applications, therefore, need to be regulated differentially by local planning boards and commissions: for example, with separate file cabinets. In larger cities and counties, they ought to be evaluated by separate staff.  This regulatory distinction means that no preemption applies to WTF applications purposed for internet protocol transmissions. Indeed, instead of permitting WTFs, various local governments around the country have decided to supply public fiber-optics to the premises (FTTP) for internet protocol services, which is superior in every way to wireless internet protocol transmissions

Infrastructural copper wires and almost all fiber-optic cables already in place were financed with public money and reside in public conduits or on poles in the public rights-of-way. These fiber-optic cables and copper wirelines cannot lawfully be claimed or used, particularly not exclusively, by unregulated private wireless companies as if they were private property, purposed for private profit.

Staff will need to determine the true identities of the respective applicants.  As obvious as this may seem, the specific agent, shell company and franchise of the wireless carrier needs to be named as its true corporate identity; it must also list its board of directors on the application.  

Equipment designed in such a way as to inflict biological harm upon the public should not be given a building permit or permission to operate, as doing so would be in violation of the intent of established codes.  

Existing standards and codes such as building codes, fire codes, general plans, and city and county guidelines, are purposed to avert harm, manage risk and liability, and protect and serve the public welfare.  The failure to uphold codes constitutes malpractice – a legal liability – and is unjust to the public. 

August 9, 2019, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals, in its Ruling in Case 18-1129 vacated FCC Order 18-30‘s deregulation of sWTFs and remanded this to the FCC.  In Case 18-1129, the judges stated that “the FCC failed to justify its determination that it is not in the public interest to require review of [sWTF] deployments” and ruled that “the Order’s deregulation of [sWTFs] is arbitrary and capricious.”

The DC Circuit judges, whose Court is esteemed as superseding the other Circuit Courts and only subsidiary to the U.S. Supreme Court, published reasons for their 8/9/19 Ruling, concluding:

The FCC failed to address that it was speeding densification “without completing its investigation of . . . health effects of low-intensity radiofrequency [microwave] radiation”.

The FCC did not adequately address the harms of deregulation.

The FCC did not justify its portrayal of those harms as negligible.

The FCC’s characterization of the Order as consistent with its longstanding policy was not “logical and rational.” . . . because the FCC mischaracterized the size, scale and footprint of the anticipated nationwide deployment of 800,000-unit network of sWTFs.

Such sWTFs are “crucially different from the consumer signal boosters and Wi-Fi routers to which the FCC compares them”.

“It is impossible on this record to credit the claim that [sWTF] deregulation will ‘leave little to no environmental footprint.'”.

The FCC fails to justify its conclusion that sWTFs “as a class” and by their “nature” are “inherently unlikely” to trigger potential significant environmental impacts.

Therefore, this 8/9/19 DC Circuit Ruling renders every sWTF application in your City / County] incomplete, where the application does not contain substantial written evidence of NEPA review. The DC Circuit judges provided judicial reasoning for remanding the matter back to the FCC so that FCC could write rules specific to sWTFs “as a class”.  Such rules would address the need for the FCC and the wireless industry to complete Environmental Assessments (“EA”) and / or Environmental Impact Statements (“EIS”) for the anticipated nationwide deployment of an 800,000-unit network of sWTFs. This judicial reasoning pertains to the class of sWTFs that includes the antennas, radios, and ancillary equipment that are often attached to utility poles, light poles and other street furniture

October 1, 2019 DC District Court vacated FCC pre--emption order from 2018.

"[Because] the Commission’s Preemption Directive, see 2018 Order ¶¶ 194–204, lies beyond its authority, we vacate the portion of the 2018 Order purporting to preempt ‘any state or local requirements that are inconsistent with [the Commission’s] deregulatory approach[,]’ see id. ¶ 194."

DC Circuit Court Case 18-1129 requirement to comply with the above Rulings and NEPA and NHPA. 

FCC’s overreach extends to its radiation exposure “guideline”, which is currently under litigation in U.S. Courts of Appeal in the Ninth and DC Circuit Court.

Congress removed “operations” from the preemption clause at 47 U.S. Code § 332(c)(7)(B)(iv), positively leaving the regulation of operations within state and local authorities’ hands, for any and all reasons and grounds: health effects, environmental effects, agricultural effects, energy conservation, atmospheric effects, weather forecasting effects, astronomy effects, aesthetic effects, historic preservation, property values, aviation safety, local and state economies, and more.